Research by Joann Peck and Terry Childers (2003) showed that evocative color names increase purchase intention and perceived product quality compared to descriptive color names. A sofa called 'Sahara' in a warm tan generates higher purchase intention than the same sofa called 'Tan' — even when subjects are shown the exact same fabric sample. The name activates an associative network (warmth, desert, luxury, natural) that colors the perception of the product itself. This effect is strongest for hedonic products (fashion, cosmetics, food) and weaker for utilitarian products (tools, office supplies). For brands in the hedonic category, color naming is not decoration — it is a measurable driver of conversion.
The Pantone Color of the Year, launched in 2000, has become the most influential annual color announcement in the design world. The selection process involves Pantone's color team traveling to design capitals (Milan, New York, London, Tokyo), attending fashion weeks, visiting galleries, and identifying recurring color narratives in culture. The chosen color is then licensed to product manufacturers who pay to use the 'Pantone Color of the Year' designation on packaging. Pantone's 2024 color (Peach Fuzz 13-1023) was adopted by cosmetics brands, home goods manufacturers, and fashion labels within weeks of announcement — demonstrating the commercial power of color authority. The Color of the Year functions as a permission structure for brands to adopt a color that is culturally validated without independent trend-forecasting research.
Apple's product color naming strategy is among the most studied in brand design. Apple avoids purely descriptive names (no 'Blue', 'Grey', 'Red') and uses names that suggest material, atmosphere, or cultural reference: 'Midnight' (dark blue-black, night sky), 'Starlight' (warm silver, celestial), 'Deep Purple' (a specific Jimi Hendrix/classic rock reference, used deliberately for the iPhone 12 Pro), 'Sierra Blue' (a specific geographical reference), 'Product Red' (a charity co-branding designation). Each name is tested for global interpretability — a name like 'Bluebell' that works in English may have no resonance in Chinese or Arabic markets. Apple's naming creates a vocabulary that is distinctive, internationally legible, and aspirational without being generic.