We're live on Product Hunt!Support us
ColorArchive

A curated color library with 5,000+ algorithmically generated colors. Browse, search, save favorites, and export palette tokens — no account required.

CollectionsFamiliesBrandsRegionsJournalNotesGuidesFree ResourcesConvertColorblindAboutSupportUpdates
Ready for static export
Privacy·Terms·Refunds·Cookies·Commerce Disclosure
colorarchive.org · © 2026 ColorArchive
Skip to content
ColorArchive
ProLog in
ArchiveAll ColorsCollections
Peony Silk Pure#F862DF
Citrine Bloom Pure#FAFA89
VS

Peony Silk Pure vs Citrine Bloom Pure

A detailed comparison of #F862DF and #FAFA89 — triadic range colors

Contrast & Accessibility

2.45:1contrast ratio
✗ AA Normal✗ AA Large✗ AAA Normal✗ AAA Large
Text on Peony Silk Pure
Text on Citrine Bloom Pure

Color Properties

#F862DF
HEX
#FAFA89
rgb(248, 98, 223)
RGB
rgb(250, 250, 137)
hsl(310, 92%, 68%)
HSL
hsl(60, 92%, 76%)
310°
Hue
60°
92%
Saturation
92%
68%
Lightness
76%
Pink
Family
Yellow
Hue Diff
110\u00B0 — Triadic range

Gradient Blend

background: linear-gradient(to right, #F862DF, #FAFA89);

Using These Colors Together

With a contrast ratio of 2.45:1, this pair does not meet WCAG guidelines for text. Use these colors as adjacent blocks, gradients, or decorative accents rather than text-on-background pairings.

These colors have a 110\u00B0 hue difference, making them triadic range. They offer moderate contrast — versatile for card designs, illustrations, and layered UI compositions.

Peony Silk Pure
view_detail →
Citrine Bloom Pure
view_detail →

Related Comparisons

Peony Silk Pure vs Mint Silk Pure
#F862DF · #62F87B
Citrine Bloom Pure vs Iris Bloom Pure
#FAFA89 · #8989FA
Blush Silk Pure vs Citrine Bloom Pure
#F862AD · #FAFA89
Peony Silk Pure vs Olive Bloom Pure
#F862DF · #D5FA89
Blush Silk Pure vs Olive Bloom Pure
#F862AD · #D5FA89